lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 3/7] [RFC] arm/arm64: introduce is_dma_coherent
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:16:14PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:51:44PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > Introduce a function to check whether a device is dma coherent.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > > > CC: linux@arm.linux.org.uk
> > > > CC: catalin.marinas@arm.com
> > > > CC: will.deacon@arm.com
> > > > CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 6 ++++++
> > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 5 +++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> > > > index c45b61a..bededbb 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> > > > @@ -126,6 +126,12 @@ static inline int set_arch_dma_coherent_ops(struct device *dev)
> > > > set_dma_ops(dev, &arm_coherent_dma_ops);
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > +
> > > > +static inline bool is_dma_coherent(struct device *dev)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return (__generic_dma_ops(dev) == &arm_coherent_dma_ops);
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > Hmm, what about the IOMMU ops?
> >
> > Maybe I should check __generic_dma_ops(dev) != &arm_dma_ops?
> > Do you have any better suggestions?
>
> ping?

Without any clear idea about why this is needed or how it's used, I don't
have any better ideas.

Will


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-13 15:21    [W:0.099 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site