lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: Clean up stack access code in irq_32.c
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 10:13:33 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:

> That's not a justification for change. Claiming no harm is nevessary but not sufficient.
>

The optimization is also a little better with GCC when using C
instead of asm for current_stack_pointer. Probably not enough better
to do different macros for gcc and other compilers though.

clang actually moves %esp to memory and then into another register
instead of moving it directly when using the current macro. Their
optimizer really needs some work...

> On October 12, 2014 9:53:32 AM PDT, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 09:47:53 -0700
> >"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> >
> >[replying to the list this time, sigh]
> >
> >> We changed this to asm because the C broke some compilers. Why are
> >you changing it back?
> >>
> >
> >The C broke some compilers because it was using a global register
> >variable. This is a local one, which the clang documentation says is
> >supported. And I compiled it with clang with no problem.
> >
> >> On October 12, 2014 9:43:53 AM PDT, Chuck Ebbert
> ><cebbert.lkml@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Use C instead of asm for accessing the stack pointer. And define
> >some
> >> >macros to make the code easier to understand.
> >> >
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-12 22:01    [W:0.088 / U:0.860 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site