On 10/10/2014 06:21 AM, Fengwei Yin wrote:> @@ -787,6 +788,9 @@ check_pfn:> return NULL;> }> > + if (is_huge_zero_pfn(pfn))> + return NULL;> +That looks a lot better. One thing, why not put the is_huge_zero_pfn()check next to the is_zero_pfn() check?