lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] regulator: Add helper function to get "poweroff-source" property
Date
Hi Grant,

Am Freitag, 10. Oktober 2014, 12:47:08 schrieb Grant Likely:
> What I'm more concerned about is the semantics of the property. What
> do the generic code paths gain by standardizing this property? Is it
> expected that
[seems to be missing some text in the original mail]

We currently see an influx of system-power-controller variants. While in the
past it only was
ti,system-power-controller

there is now already
maxim,system-power-controller
rockchip,system-power-controller

Romain's work would introduce "active-semi,system-power-controller", I have a
"netronix,system-power-controller" sitting in some distant tree and there may
be more already waiting somewhere.

So in the worst case I'd think you could expect such a property for every
pmic-vendor in vendor-prefixes.txt ... as it seems to be a quite common use-
case these days to have the pmic handle system power on its own.


Heiko


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-10 15:02    [W:0.057 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site