lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] Perf Bench: Locking Microbenchmark
Em Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 07:28:32AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> If you compare an strace of AIM7 steady state and 'perf bench
> lock' steady state, is it comparable, i.e. do the syscalls and

Isn't "lock" too generic? Isn't this stressing some specific lock and if
so shouldn't that be made abundantly clear in the 'perf bench' test name
and in the docs?

Or is this the case that it started by using 'creat' calls to stress
some locking and will go on adding more syscalls to stress more kernel
locks?

- Arnaldo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-01 19:41    [W:1.534 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site