lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] ASoC: fsl_esai: Add ESAI CPU DAI driver
Resent this because of losing attached file.

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:32:52AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:44:53PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:57:58PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> >
> > > +/**
> > > + * This function configures the ratio between MCLK (HCK) and BCLK (SCK)
> > > + * (For DAI Master Mode only)
> > > + *
> > > + * Note: Machine driver should calculate the ratio to call this function.
> > > + * Only effective after calling set_dai_sysclk() to set HCK direction.
> > > + */
> > > +static int fsl_esai_set_bclk_ratio(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, unsigned int ratio)
> >
> > Why does the machine driver have to do this by hand, being able to
> > override is fine but having sensible defaults is easier? Or does it
> > actually do that and the comment just needs updating?
>
> The divider part of ESAI is pretty complicated due to caring about three
> configure bits - ETO, ETI, HCKD. (I've attached a diagram to this mail.)
> So setting sysclk() alone is not enough to take care all the configurations.
> That's why I designed these two interfaces at the first place. And it should
> be hard to find a default situation.
>
> But there is one approach to omit this calling for machine driver is to do
> the set_bclk_ratio() at this CPU DAI driver. And this might be a good idea
> because we can then separate the settings between PLAYBACK and CAPTURE, even
> though we might then need to check the Master or Slave state to apply the
> settings accordingly.
>
> I'll try this idea in v3 if you feel it's plausible.
>
> > > + ret = devm_snd_soc_register_component(&pdev->dev, &fsl_esai_component,
> > > + &fsl_esai_dai, 1);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register DAI: %d\n", ret);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = imx_pcm_dma_init(pdev);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to init imx pcm dma: %d\n", ret);
> > > +
> > > + /* Reset ESAI unit */
> > > + regmap_write(esai_priv->regmap, REG_ESAI_ECR, ESAI_ECR_ERST);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * We need to enable ESAI so as to access some of its registers.
> > > + * Otherwise, we would fail to dump regmap from user space.
> > > + */
> > > + regmap_write(esai_priv->regmap, REG_ESAI_ECR, ESAI_ECR_ESAIEN);
> >
> > I would expect to see the hardware initialisation before we start
> > registering with the core otherwise the core might start trying to run
> > prior to the hardware being initialised.
>
> Will switch this initial code in v3 as your suggestion.
>
> Thank you,
> Nicolin Chen
[unhandled content-type:image/jpeg]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-10 04:21    [W:0.054 / U:0.844 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site