Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:10:32 -0500 | From | Santosh Shilimkar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch |
| |
On Thursday 09 January 2014 05:31 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Wednesday 08 January 2014 07:38 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Tuesday 07 January 2014 11:06 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>> On Tuesday 07 January 2014 11:22 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>>> Sekhar, >>>> >>>> On Tuesday 24 December 2013 06:41 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >>>>> This series is intended to update Davinci GPIO driver and reuse >>>>> it for Keystone SoCs, because Keystone uses the similar GPIO IP like Davinci. >>>>> Keystone GPIO IP: supports: >>>>> - up to 32 GPIO lines; >>>>> - only unbanked irqs; >>>>> >>>>> See Documentation: >>>>> Keystone - http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf >>>>> >>>>> This series based on: >>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/nsekhar/linux-davinci.git/log/?h=v3.14/gpio >>>>> >>>>> Changes in v3: >>>>> - fixed code, changed by mistake; fixed sparse warning >>>>> Changes in v2: >>>>> - minor comments applied, no functional changes >>>>> >>>>> v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/18/135 >>>>> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/12/366 >>>>> >>>>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >>>>> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> >>>>> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> >>>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> >>>>> >>>>> Grygorii Strashko (2): >>>>> gpio: davinci: don't create irq_domain in case of unbanked irqs >>>>> gpio: davinci: reuse for Keystone SoC >>>>> >>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt | 4 +- >>>>> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 82 ++++++++++++++------ >>>>> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>> Have you picked up the $subject series in your queue ? >>> >>> Not yet, at least on the new compatible introduction, I need an ack from >>> DT folks. >>> >> I noticed that but the usual 2 weeks period to get ack is over I guess ;-) >> The DT part is really trivial as well but I let you decide. > > I just realize that Rob's e-mail address bounces. I have added his > updated address now and hopefully he will see this to provide his ack. > > Rob, > > We need your ack on 2/2 of this series. If you do not have the patch, I > can forward it to you. > >> >>> I am happy with the patches though and have tested them as well, In case >>> I do not get an ack from 2/2 in time, I can at least send 1/2 for >>> inclusion after my first gpio pull request to ARM-SoC gets pulled. >>> >> Would be great to get both of them but if not both at least 1/2. > > I had already sent it with my first pull request. Hmph. Everything > except 2/2 of tis series should be in linux-next now. > Thanks !!
| |