Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Namhyung Kim <> | Subject | [PATCH 10/28] perf report: Cache cumulative callchains | Date | Wed, 8 Jan 2014 17:46:15 +0900 |
| |
It is possble that a callchain has cycles or recursive calls. In that case it'll end up having entries more than 100% overhead in the output. In order to prevent such entries, cache each callchain node and skip if same entry already cumulated.
Cc: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> --- tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c index 06330736485b..087d01cac1aa 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c @@ -363,7 +363,27 @@ static int iter_prepare_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter __maybe_unused, struct addr_location *al __maybe_unused) { + struct callchain_cursor_node *node; + struct hist_entry **he_cache; + callchain_cursor_commit(&callchain_cursor); + + /* + * This is for detecting cycles or recursions so that they're + * cumulated only one time to prevent entries more than 100% + * overhead. + */ + he_cache = malloc(sizeof(*he_cache) * (PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH + 1)); + if (he_cache == NULL) + return -ENOMEM; + + iter->priv = he_cache; + iter->curr = 0; + + node = callchain_cursor_current(&callchain_cursor); + if (node == NULL) + return 0; + return 0; } @@ -373,6 +393,7 @@ iter_add_single_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, { struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel; struct perf_sample *sample = iter->sample; + struct hist_entry **he_cache = iter->priv; struct hist_entry *he; he = __hists__add_entry(&evsel->hists, al, iter->parent, NULL, NULL, @@ -381,6 +402,8 @@ iter_add_single_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, if (he == NULL) return -ENOMEM; + he_cache[iter->curr++] = he; + return hist_entry__inc_addr_samples(he, evsel->idx, al->addr); } @@ -408,8 +431,8 @@ iter_next_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, goto out; } - if (al->map->groups == &iter->machine->kmaps) { - if (machine__is_host(iter->machine)) { + if (al->map->groups == &al->machine->kmaps) { + if (machine__is_host(al->machine)) { al->cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL; al->level = 'k'; } else { @@ -417,7 +440,7 @@ iter_next_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, al->level = 'g'; } } else { - if (machine__is_host(iter->machine)) { + if (machine__is_host(al->machine)) { al->cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER; al->level = '.'; } else if (perf_guest) { @@ -440,7 +463,29 @@ iter_add_next_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, { struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel; struct perf_sample *sample = iter->sample; + struct hist_entry **he_cache = iter->priv; struct hist_entry *he; + struct hist_entry he_tmp = { + .cpu = al->cpu, + .thread = al->thread, + .comm = thread__comm(al->thread), + .ip = al->addr, + .ms = { + .map = al->map, + .sym = al->sym, + }, + .parent = iter->parent, + }; + int i; + + /* + * Check if there's duplicate entries in the callchain. + * It's possible that it has cycles or recursive calls. + */ + for (i = 0; i < iter->curr; i++) { + if (hist_entry__cmp(he_cache[i], &he_tmp) == 0) + return 0; + } he = __hists__add_entry(&evsel->hists, al, iter->parent, NULL, NULL, sample->period, sample->weight, @@ -448,6 +493,8 @@ iter_add_next_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, if (he == NULL) return -ENOMEM; + he_cache[iter->curr++] = he; + return hist_entry__inc_addr_samples(he, evsel->idx, al->addr); } @@ -461,6 +508,7 @@ iter_finish_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter, evsel->hists.stats.total_period += sample->period; hists__inc_nr_events(&evsel->hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE); + zfree(&iter->priv); return 0; } -- 1.7.11.7
| |