lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 3.12 000/144] 3.12.7-stable review
    On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:56:21AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
    > On 01/07/2014 02:00 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
    > > On 01/07/2014 12:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
    > >> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:07:14PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
    > >>> On 01/06/2014 03:36 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
    > >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.7 release.
    > >>>> There are 144 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
    > >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
    > >>>> let me know.
    > >>>>
    > >>>> Responses should be made by Wed Jan 8 22:37:25 UTC 2014.
    > >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
    > >>>>
    > >>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
    > >>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.7-rc1.gz
    > >>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
    > >>>>
    > >>>> thanks,
    > >>>>
    > >>>> greg k-h
    > >>>
    > >>> Patches testing - passed
    > >>> Compile testing - passed
    > >>> Boot testing - passed
    > >>> dmesg regression testing - passed
    > >>>
    > >>> Test systems
    > >>>
    > >>> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later)
    > >>> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
    > >>> Dell OptiPlex 790 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400
    > >>>
    > >>> Detailed test status
    > >>>
    > >>> Patches applied cleanly
    > >>> dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this
    > >>> release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn.
    > >>
    > >> Just in time for me to do a -rc2 release for this, and the 3.10 -rc1
    > >> announcement, sorry :)
    > >>
    > >
    > > 3.10.26-rc2 and 3.12.7-rc2 are looking good on all my 3 test systems. No dmesg regressions.
    > >
    > Same here.

    Great, thanks to both of you for testing and letting me know.

    greg k-h


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2014-01-08 16:21    [W:7.131 / U:0.152 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site