lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/3] ata: ahci_platform: Manage SATA PHY
Hi Roger,

On Wednesday 08 January 2014 03:17 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> From: Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com>
>
> Some platforms have a PHY hooked up to the
> SATA controller. The PHY needs to be initialized
> and powered up for SATA to work. We do that
> using the PHY framework.
>
> [Roger Q] Cleaned up.
>
> CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/ata/ahci.h | 2 ++
> drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.h b/drivers/ata/ahci.h
> index 2289efd..f9bbada 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.h
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/libata.h>
> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>
> /* Enclosure Management Control */
> #define EM_CTRL_MSG_TYPE 0x000f0000
> @@ -322,6 +323,7 @@ struct ahci_host_priv {
> u32 em_buf_sz; /* EM buffer size in byte */
> u32 em_msg_type; /* EM message type */
> struct clk *clk; /* Only for platforms supporting clk */
> + struct phy *phy; /* If platform uses phy */
> void *plat_data; /* Other platform data */
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> index d5ced13..f61093b 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,21 @@ static int ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> + hpriv->phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "sata-phy");
> + if (IS_ERR(hpriv->phy)) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "can't get sata-phy\n");
> + /* return only if -EPROBE_DEFER */
> + if (PTR_ERR(hpriv->phy) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> + rc = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + goto disable_unprepare_clk;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(hpriv->phy)) {
> + phy_init(hpriv->phy);

Don't we have to check the return values of phy_init and phy_power_on? Is it
not needed because it is an optional phy?

Thanks
Kishon


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-08 12:21    [W:0.086 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site