Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:59:06 -0500 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] ftrace/x86: Load ftrace_ops in parameter not the variable holding it |
| |
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:06:33 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 12:20 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > Function tracing callbacks expect to have the ftrace_ops that registered it > > passed to them, not the address of the variable that holds the ftrace_ops > > that registered it. > > > > Use a mov instead of a lea to store the ftrace_ops into the parameter > > of the function tracing callback. > > > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > This looks like an urgent fix, am I correct?
Hi Peter, I think this patch got missed somehow. Can you pull it in. You can also add Masami's reviewed-by tag too.
Also add the following tags:
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.8+ Fixes: 2f5f6ad9390c1 ("ftrace: Pass ftrace_ops as third parameter to function trace callback")
Thanks!
-- Steve
| |