lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC] sched: CPU topology try
    On 01/07/2014 03:20 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 03:10:21PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
    >> What if we want to add arch specific flags to the NUMA domain? Currently
    >> with Peter's patch:https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/239 and this patch,
    >> the arch can modify the sd flags of the topology levels till just before
    >> the NUMA domain. In sd_init_numa(), the flags for the NUMA domain get
    >> initialized. We need to perhaps call into arch here to probe for
    >> additional flags?
    >
    > What are you thinking of? I was hoping all NUMA details were captured in
    > the distance table.
    >
    > Its far easier to talk of specifics in this case.
    >
    If the processor can be core gated, then there is very little power
    savings that we could yield from consolidating all the load onto a
    single node in a NUMA domain. 6 cores on one node or 3 cores each on two
    nodes, the power is drawn by 6 cores in all. So I was thinking under
    this circumstance we might want to set the SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN flag at
    the NUMA domain and spread the load if it favours the workload.

    Regards
    Preeti U Murthy



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2014-01-07 12:21    [W:8.587 / U:0.844 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site