lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [sched] 23f0d2093c: -12.6% regression on sparse file copy
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:10:07PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Joonsoo,
>
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:30:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 05:04:56PM +0800, fengguang.wu@intel.com wrote:
> > > Hi Joonsoo,
> > >
> > > We noticed the below changes for commit 23f0d2093c ("sched: Factor out
> > > code to should_we_balance()") in test vm-scalability/300s-lru-file-readtwice
> >
> > Hello, Fengguang.
> >
> > There was a mistake in this patch and there was a fix and it was already merged
> > into mainline.
> >
> > Could you test again with the commit (b0cff9d sched: Fix load balancing
> > performance regression in should_we_balance())?
>
> Yes, b0cff9d completely restores the performance. Sorry for the noise!

Thanks for quick response. :)



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-06 09:41    [W:3.004 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site