Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:49:28 +0900 | From | Joonsoo Kim <> | Subject | Re: [sched] 23f0d2093c: -12.6% regression on sparse file copy |
| |
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:10:07PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Joonsoo, > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:30:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 05:04:56PM +0800, fengguang.wu@intel.com wrote: > > > Hi Joonsoo, > > > > > > We noticed the below changes for commit 23f0d2093c ("sched: Factor out > > > code to should_we_balance()") in test vm-scalability/300s-lru-file-readtwice > > > > Hello, Fengguang. > > > > There was a mistake in this patch and there was a fix and it was already merged > > into mainline. > > > > Could you test again with the commit (b0cff9d sched: Fix load balancing > > performance regression in should_we_balance())? > > Yes, b0cff9d completely restores the performance. Sorry for the noise!
Thanks for quick response. :)
| |