lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2] ACPI/Battery: Add a _BIX quirk for NEC LZ750/LS
Date
On Monday, January 06, 2014 09:59:12 AM Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Lan,
>
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:50:37PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> > The aml method _BIX of NEC LZ750/LS returns a broken package which
> > skip the first member "Revision" according ACPI 5.0 spec Table 10-234.
> >
> > This patch is to add a quirk for this machine to skip member "Revision"
> > during parsing _BIX returned package.
> >
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Francisco Castro <fcr@adinet.com.uy>
> > Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67351
> > Cc: 3.8+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>

Queued up as a fix for 3.13 (I fixed up the indentation).

Thanks!

> > ---
> > Change since v1:
> > Remove battery_bix_package_quirk() function and set
> > battery_bix_broken_package flag according the returned value
> > of dmi_check_system().
> >
> > drivers/acpi/battery.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> > index e90ef8b..d21cc1a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> > @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>");
> > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ACPI Battery Driver");
> > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >
> > +static int battery_bix_broken_package;
> > static unsigned int cache_time = 1000;
> > module_param(cache_time, uint, 0644);
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(cache_time, "cache time in milliseconds");
> > @@ -415,7 +416,12 @@ static int acpi_battery_get_info(struct acpi_battery *battery)
> > ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating %s", name));
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> > - if (test_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_XINFO_PRESENT, &battery->flags))
> > +
> > + if (battery_bix_broken_package)
> > + result = extract_package(battery, buffer.pointer,
> > + extended_info_offsets + 1,
> > + ARRAY_SIZE(extended_info_offsets) - 1);
> > + else if (test_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_XINFO_PRESENT, &battery->flags))
> > result = extract_package(battery, buffer.pointer,
> > extended_info_offsets,
> > ARRAY_SIZE(extended_info_offsets));
> > @@ -753,6 +759,17 @@ static int battery_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct dmi_system_id bat_dmi_table[] = {
> > + {
> > + .ident = "NEC LZ750/LS",
> > + .matches = {
> > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "NEC"),
> > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "PC-LZ750LS"),
> > + },
>
> This does not appear at be indented properly. I see there some
> inventive formatting in drivers/acpi, but I believe the proper form is:
>
> static struct dmi_system_id bat_dmi_table[] = {
> {
> .ident = "NEC LZ750/LS",
> .matches = {
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "NEC"),
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "PC-LZ750LS"),
> },
> },
> {}
> };
>
> Otherwise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks.
>
>

--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-06 23:41    [W:0.118 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site