lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] sched: cleanup trigger_load_balance
On 01/06/2014 12:03 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 06:19:04PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> I understand. Happy new year !
>
> Happy new year to you too! :-)
>
>> ps : the patchset is based on tip/sched/core
>
> Weird; because tip/sched/core as per today looks like:
>
>
> 029632fbb7b7c kernel/sched_fair.c (Peter Zijlstra 2011-10-25 10:00:11 +0200 6872) void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq, int cpu)
>
> And your patches assume it looks like:
>
> Patch 1: @@ -6878,7 +6878,7 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
> Patch 2: @@ -6875,10 +6875,10 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
> Patch 4:
> void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
> {
> - int cpu = rq->cpu;
> -
>
> Which obviously doesn't quite work..
>
>
> So I can make it fit.. but I do wonder what I'm missing here..


Ah, ok. I got it. I missed to send the first patch of my patchset:

sched: reduce trigger_load_balance parameters

Let me resend the patchset with the missing patch.

Sorry for the inconvenience

-- Daniel



--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-06 12:41    [W:0.043 / U:5.656 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site