Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:25:55 +0100 | From | Daniel Lezcano <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] sched: cleanup trigger_load_balance |
| |
On 01/06/2014 12:03 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 06:19:04PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> I understand. Happy new year ! > > Happy new year to you too! :-) > >> ps : the patchset is based on tip/sched/core > > Weird; because tip/sched/core as per today looks like: > > > 029632fbb7b7c kernel/sched_fair.c (Peter Zijlstra 2011-10-25 10:00:11 +0200 6872) void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq, int cpu) > > And your patches assume it looks like: > > Patch 1: @@ -6878,7 +6878,7 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq) > Patch 2: @@ -6875,10 +6875,10 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq) > Patch 4: > void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq) > { > - int cpu = rq->cpu; > - > > Which obviously doesn't quite work.. > > > So I can make it fit.. but I do wonder what I'm missing here..
Ah, ok. I got it. I missed to send the first patch of my patchset:
sched: reduce trigger_load_balance parameters
Let me resend the patchset with the missing patch.
Sorry for the inconvenience
-- Daniel
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |