Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Jan 2014 11:10:39 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep |
| |
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:28:31PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > On 01/02/2014 04:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote: > >> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead > >> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep > >> enabled seqcount methods. > >> > >> This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations > >> as well, which will be utilized in a following patch. > > Ack on this and on 2/2. I'm assuming I'll get them through the -tip > > tree, which is where the problem came from. No? > > It seems Peter or Ingo are still on holiday. Hopefully they will be back > on Monday to queue these.
Done! thanks!
| |