lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options
On 01/04/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:20:14 -0800 Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> wrote:
>> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
>> There is *NOTHING* architecture-specific about SECCOMP except
>> that the syscalls have per-architecture definitions, like every
>> other syscall. It is absurd to have the option in the
>> arch-specific menus.
>
> You seem to have (mostly) lost the dependency some of the architecture
> versions of config SECCOMP had on PROC_FS ...

I _believe_ the /proc interface has gone away. I can't find any
reference to /proc/<pid>/seccomp in any of the code. Is there some
/proc dependency that I'm missing outside of the removed
/proc/<pid>/seccomp interface?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-04 20:41    [W:0.135 / U:0.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site