[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subjectx86_pmu_start WARN_ON.
I gave Vince's perf_fuzzer a run, hoping to trigger a different perf bug
that I've been seeing. Instead I hit a different bug.

WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 9277 at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c:1076 x86_pmu_start+0xd1/0x110()
CPU: 1 PID: 9277 Comm: perf_fuzzer Not tainted 3.13.0+ #101
0000000000000009 0000000047887442 ffff88024d043da8 ffffffffbd7387ba
0000000000000000 ffff88024d043de0 ffffffffbd06d28d ffff88024d04bba0
ffff880104c9ef60 0000000000000004 0000000000000002 ffff88024d04bddc
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffffbd7387ba>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x7a
[<ffffffffbd06d28d>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0
[<ffffffffbd06d3ba>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[<ffffffffbd018421>] x86_pmu_start+0xd1/0x110
[<ffffffffbd018b9f>] x86_pmu_enable+0x22f/0x320
[<ffffffffbd150bca>] perf_pmu_enable+0x2a/0x30
[<ffffffffbd152711>] perf_cpu_hrtimer_handler+0xe1/0x1f0
[<ffffffffbd097582>] __run_hrtimer+0x72/0x250
[<ffffffffbd152630>] ? perf_event_context_sched_in.isra.85+0xc0/0xc0
[<ffffffffbd097e97>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x107/0x260
[<ffffffffbd030744>] local_apic_timer_interrupt+0x34/0x60
[<ffffffffbd74deba>] smp_trace_apic_timer_interrupt+0x4a/0x125
[<ffffffffbd74cb2f>] trace_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80
<EOI> [<ffffffffbd743e4d>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13

1076 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(event->hw.state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)))
1077 return;

It reproduces pretty quickly for me (within a minute or two of runtime).
Oddly the generated test case from the log file doesn't reproduce.


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-30 20:41    [W:0.146 / U:0.644 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site