Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:22:44 -0800 | From | tip-bot for Waiman Long <> | Subject | [tip:core/locking] locking/mutexes/mcs: Correct barrier usage |
| |
Commit-ID: aff7385b5a16bca6b8d9243f01a9ea5a5b411e1d Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/aff7385b5a16bca6b8d9243f01a9ea5a5b411e1d Author: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com> AuthorDate: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:35:53 -0800 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> CommitDate: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:13:26 +0100
locking/mutexes/mcs: Correct barrier usage
This patch corrects the way memory barriers are used in the MCS lock with smp_load_acquire and smp_store_release fucnctions. The previous barriers could leak critical sections if mcs lock is used by itself. It is not a problem when mcs lock is embedded in mutex but will be an issue when the mcs_lock is used elsewhere.
The patch removes the incorrect barriers and put in correct barriers with the pair of functions smp_load_acquire and smp_store_release.
Suggested-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1390347353.3138.62.camel@schen9-DESK Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- kernel/locking/mutex.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c index 4dd6e4c..fbbd2ed 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -136,9 +136,12 @@ void mspin_lock(struct mspin_node **lock, struct mspin_node *node) return; } ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node; - smp_wmb(); - /* Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down */ - while (!ACCESS_ONCE(node->locked)) + /* + * Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down. + * Using smp_load_acquire() provides a memory barrier that + * ensures subsequent operations happen after the lock is acquired. + */ + while (!(smp_load_acquire(&node->locked))) arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); } @@ -156,8 +159,13 @@ static void mspin_unlock(struct mspin_node **lock, struct mspin_node *node) while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next))) arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); } - ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1; - smp_wmb(); + /* + * Pass lock to next waiter. + * smp_store_release() provides a memory barrier to ensure + * all operations in the critical section has been completed + * before unlocking. + */ + smp_store_release(&next->locked, 1); } /*
| |