lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] perf-bench: introduce futex microbenchmarks
From
Date
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 10:13 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 06:44 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 11:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patchset adds three programs that stress and measure different
> > > > futex operations: (i) uaddr hashing, (ii) wakeups and (iii)
> > > > requeuing/waiting.
> > > >
> > > > More details and usage examples in each individual patch, along with
> > > > parameter descriptions in the code.
> > > >
> > > > While the previous effort (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/17/207) to
> > > > add futex benchmarks to perf-bench failed, I strongly believe that
> > > > perf is an ideal place for these kinds of programs. This patchset is
> > > > different from Hitoshi's because it does not try to take over
> > > > Darren's futextest suite, and only deals with finer grained aspects
> > > > of the kernel's implementation, and thus mostly useful for kernel
> > > > hacking. Furthermore, by being part of the kernel tree, it can get
> > > > more attention and naturally evolve with time.
> > >
> > > Looks pretty useful!
> > >
> > > Could the two approaches be merged?
> >
> > Unless Darren doesn't want to, I don't see why not. I can resurrect
> > Hitoshi's original patch if/after this series is applied.
>
> Apologies, I only am just now seeing this.
>
> I agree that we should take whatever makes sense for perf out of
> futex-test and merge it with perf. It will see greater use and receive
> more review and improvements than it will in my obscure repository.
>
> With trinity covering the fuzz testing and perf handling performance
> tests, I think futex-test can be reduced down to a functional
> test-suite, which is perfectly fine with me.
>
> If there is still interest here, I'll support it.

Arnaldo, could you consider this for 3.15? I've also got some additional
work for perf-bench but am waiting for this to get settled first.

Thanks,
Davidlohr



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-28 05:41    [W:0.049 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site