lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: bring back /sys/kernel/mm
[[PATCH] mm: bring back /sys/kernel/mm] On 26/01/2014 (Sun 18:52) Hugh Dickins wrote:

> Commit da29bd36224b ("mm/mm_init.c: make creation of the mm_kobj happen
> earlier than device_initcall") changed to pure_initcall(mm_sysfs_init).
>
> That's too early: mm_sysfs_init() depends on core_initcall(ksysfs_init)
> to have made the kernel_kobj directory "kernel" in which to create "mm".
>
> Make it postcore_initcall(mm_sysfs_init). We could use core_initcall(),
> and depend upon Makefile link order kernel/ mm/ fs/ ipc/ security/ ...
> as core_initcall(debugfs_init) and core_initcall(securityfs_init) do;
> but better not.

Agreed, N+1 is better than link order. I guess it silently fails then,
with /sys/kernel/mm missing as the symptom? I'd booted i386 and ppc
and didn't spot this, unfortunately... wondering now if there was a
hint in dmesg that I simply failed to notice.

>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>

Acked-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

Thanks,
Paul.

> ---
>
> mm/mm_init.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- 3.13.0+/mm/mm_init.c 2014-01-23 21:51:26.004001378 -0800
> +++ linux/mm/mm_init.c 2014-01-26 18:06:40.488488209 -0800
> @@ -202,4 +202,4 @@ static int __init mm_sysfs_init(void)
>
> return 0;
> }
> -pure_initcall(mm_sysfs_init);
> +postcore_initcall(mm_sysfs_init);


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-27 05:21    [W:0.047 / U:1.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site