lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] rcu: Eliminate softirq processing from rcutree
From
Date
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 20:46 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: 
> * Mike Galbraith | 2013-12-23 06:12:39 [+0100]:
>
> >P.S.
> >
> >virgin -rt7 doing tbench 64 + make -j64
> >
> >[ 97.907960] perf samples too long (3138 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
> >[ 103.047921] perf samples too long (5544 > 5000), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 25000
> >[ 181.561271] perf samples too long (10318 > 10000), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 13000
> >[ 184.243750] INFO: NMI handler (perf_event_nmi_handler) took too long to run: 1.084 msecs
> >[ 248.914422] perf samples too long (19719 > 19230), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 7000
> >[ 382.116674] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 10
> This is block
>
> >[ 405.201593] perf samples too long (36824 > 35714), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 4000
> >[ 444.704185] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
> >[ 444.704208] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
> >[ 444.704579] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
> >[ 444.704678] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
> >[ 444.705100] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
> >[ 444.705980] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
> >[ 444.705994] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
> >[ 444.708315] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
> >[ 444.710348] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
>
> and this is RX. Is your testcase heavy disk-io or heavy disk-io +
> network?

Yeah.

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-25 07:01    [W:0.064 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site