lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 10/24] drm/i2c: tda998x: don't read write-only registers
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 07:58:42PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> This patch takes care of the write-only registers of the tda998x.
>
> The value 'MAT_CONTRL_MAT_SC(1)' in the register MAT_CONTRL has been
> set as it is at reset time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
> ---
> v3
> - remarks from Russell King
> - don't move the sync polarity setting after the setting of the
> register TBG_CNTRL_0 which must be the last setting of the
> init sequence

This is better, except I find that there's an additional change in this
version which wasn't in the original patch 9:

> /* must be last register set: */
> - reg_clear(priv, REG_TBG_CNTRL_0, TBG_CNTRL_0_SYNC_ONCE);
> + reg_write(priv, REG_TBG_CNTRL_0, 0);

Register changes which have a potential effect shouldn't be part of a
patch which is really only trying to avoid reading from write only
registers.

This could be a potential functional change - and it's probably one
which Rob Clark should at least be made aware of. As I commented last
time, when you're changing register values in an otherwise innocuous
patch, you should comment about them in the patch description.

--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-22 23:21    [W:0.035 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site