Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:20:18 +0100 | From | Jiri Olsa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHSET 00/24] perf tools: Add support to accumulate hist periods (v6) |
| |
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:25:33PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > This is a new attempt to implement cumulative hist period report. > This work begins from Arun's SORT_INCLUSIVE patch [1] but I completely > rewrote it from scratch. > > This patchset is based on my previous patchset [2] but I think it's > almost independent so that it can be applied separately. > > Please see the patch 03/24. I refactored functions that add hist > entries with struct hist_entry_iter. While I converted all functions > carefully, it'd be better anyone can test and confirm that I didn't > mess up something - especially for branch stack and mem stuff. > > This patchset basically adds period in a sample to every node in the > callchain. A hist_entry now has an additional fields to keep the > cumulative period if --children option is given on perf report. > > I changed the option as a separate --children and added a new > "Children" column (and renamed the default "Overhead" column into > "Self"). The output will be sorted by children (cumulative) overhead > for now. The reason I changed to the --children is that I still think > it's much different from other --call-graph options. The --call-graph > option will take care of it even with --children option. > > I know that the UI should be changed also to be more flexible as Ingo > requested, but I'd like to do this first and then move to work on the > next. I also added a new config option to enable it by default. > > * changes in v6: > - separate struct hist_iter_ops (Jiri) > - check iter->he before calling ->add_entry_cb (Jiri) > - fix locking issue on perf top (Jiri)
I have changes on top of this patchset and all looks great, I was just going throught this again and wanted to send my ack, but it no longer merges to the acme's perf/core.
Could you please send updated version, and I'll finish the review.. I promise ;-)
thanks, jirka
| |