lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] numa,sched,mm: remove p->numa_migrate_deferred
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:21:02PM -0500, riel@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>
> Excessive migration of pages can hurt the performance of workloads
> that span multiple NUMA nodes. However, it turns out that the
> p->numa_migrate_deferred knob is a really big hammer, which does
> reduce migration rates, but does not actually help performance.
>
> Now that the second stage of the automatic numa balancing code
> has stabilized, it is time to replace the simplistic migration
> deferral code with something smarter.
>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

When I added a tracepoint to track deferred migration I was surprised how
often it triggered for some workloads. I agree that we want to do something
better because it was a crutch albeit a necessary one at the time.

Note that the knob was not about performance as such, it was about avoiding
worst-case behaviour. We should keep an eye out for bugs that look like
excessive migration on workloads that are not converging. Reintroducing this
hammer would be a last resort for working around the problem.

Finally, the sysctl is documented in Documentation/sysctl/kernel.txt and
this patch should also remove it.

Functionally, the patch looks fine and it's time to reinvestigate if
it's necessary so assuming the documentation gets removed;

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-21 13:41    [W:0.146 / U:1.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site