Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:41:08 -0800 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH tip/core/timers 3/4] timers: Reduce future __run_timers() latency for newly emptied list |
| |
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:54:05PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:20:47 -0800 > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c > > index 295837e5e011..bdd1c00ec4ec 100644 > > --- a/kernel/timer.c > > +++ b/kernel/timer.c > > @@ -700,6 +700,7 @@ static int detach_if_pending(struct timer_list *timer, struct tvec_base *base, > > base->next_timer = base->timer_jiffies; > > } > > base->all_timers--; > > + (void)catchup_timer_jiffies(base); > > Why the "(void)" ?
Just a way of saying "I really did intend to ignore the return value."
Thanx, Paul
> -- Steve > > > return 1; > > } > > >
| |