[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [QUERY]: Is using CPU hotplug right for isolating CPUs?
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 02:57:36PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Again,
> I am now successful in isolating a CPU completely using CPUsets,
> NO_HZ_FULL and CPU hotplug..
> My setup and requirements for those who weren't following the
> earlier mails:
> For networking machines it is required to run data plane threads on
> some CPUs (i.e. one thread per CPU) and these CPUs shouldn't be
> interrupted by kernel at all.
> Earlier I tried CPUSets with NO_HZ by creating two groups with
> load_balancing disabled between them and manually tried to move
> all tasks out to CPU0 group. But even then there were interruptions
> which were continuously coming on CPU1 (which I am trying to
> isolate). These were some workqueue events, some timers (like
> prandom), timer overflow events (As NO_HZ_FULL pushes hrtimer
> to long ahead in future, 450 seconds, rather than disabling them
> completely, and these hardware timers were overflowing their
> counters after 90 seconds on Samsung Exynos board).

Are you sure about that? NO_HZ_FULL shouldn't touch much hrtimers.
Those are independant from the tick.

Although some of them seem to rely on the softirq, but that seem to
concern the tick hrtimer only.

 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-15 19:01    [W:0.123 / U:9.804 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site