lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 13/14] mm, hugetlb: retry if failed to allocate and there is concurrent user
From
Date
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 19:08 -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
> > > If Andrew agree, It would be great to merge 1-7 patches into mainline
> > > before your mutex approach. There are some of clean-up patches and, IMO,
> > > it makes the code more readable and maintainable, so it is worth to merge
> > > separately.
> >
> > Fine by me.
> >
>
> It appears like patches 1-7 are still missing from linux-next, would you
> mind posting them in a series with your approach?

I haven't looked much into patches 4-7, but at least the first three are
ok. I was waiting for Andrew to take all seven for linux-next and then
I'd rebase my approach on top. Anyway, unless Andrew has any
preferences, if by later this week they're not picked up, I'll resend
everything.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-15 06:21    [W:0.093 / U:0.776 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site