lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: security review needed - Re: [PATCH] ohci: Turn remote DMA support into a module parameter
On Dec 23 Stefan Richter wrote:
> On Dec 22 Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > This makes it possible to debug kernel over FireWire without the need to
> > recompile it.
> >
> > Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
>
> Looks good to me. A load-time option is preferable over a compile-time
> option not only from the POV of the debugging use case, but also from the
> maintenance POV.
>
> It weakens security in two scenarios though, AFAICS:
>
> A)
> - There are firewire-ohci and firewire-sbp2 installed on the machine,
> - the attacker cannot upload code
> - but can load kernel modules
> - and has physical access to a 1394 port
> - and is not able to run a minimal SBP-2 target on the remote 1394 end.
>
> B)
> - There is firewire-ohci but not firewire-sbp2 installed on the machine,
> - the attacker cannot upload code
> - but can load kernel modules
> - and has physical access to a 1394 port.
>
> (In both scenarios, the attacker additionally has to be able to /un/load
> kernel modules if firewire-ohci was loaded already before the attack.)
>
> That's both quite specific. Hence the security impact of this patch is
> negligible in my opinion. Any other opinions or insights into it?

Since there were no objections, I committed it to linux1394.git master
and for-next now.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-====- ---= -==--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-12 19:21    [W:0.504 / U:0.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site