Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Jan 2014 18:59:21 +0100 | From | Stefan Richter <> | Subject | Re: security review needed - Re: [PATCH] ohci: Turn remote DMA support into a module parameter |
| |
On Dec 23 Stefan Richter wrote: > On Dec 22 Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > This makes it possible to debug kernel over FireWire without the need to > > recompile it. > > > > Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> > > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk> > > Looks good to me. A load-time option is preferable over a compile-time > option not only from the POV of the debugging use case, but also from the > maintenance POV. > > It weakens security in two scenarios though, AFAICS: > > A) > - There are firewire-ohci and firewire-sbp2 installed on the machine, > - the attacker cannot upload code > - but can load kernel modules > - and has physical access to a 1394 port > - and is not able to run a minimal SBP-2 target on the remote 1394 end. > > B) > - There is firewire-ohci but not firewire-sbp2 installed on the machine, > - the attacker cannot upload code > - but can load kernel modules > - and has physical access to a 1394 port. > > (In both scenarios, the attacker additionally has to be able to /un/load > kernel modules if firewire-ohci was loaded already before the attack.) > > That's both quite specific. Hence the security impact of this patch is > negligible in my opinion. Any other opinions or insights into it?
Since there were no objections, I committed it to linux1394.git master and for-next now. -- Stefan Richter -=====-====- ---= -==-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/
| |