Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Jan 2014 18:03:54 +0100 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86, mpx: extend siginfo structure to include bound violation information |
| |
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 08:49:21AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > I saw a previous version of the code that did that, and it really > didn't work out well -- it ended up being more complex and slower.
I suspected as much.
But, we still probably should use the generic struct insn, insn_field, etc and act on them in mpx.c instead of defining our own mpx_insn, mpx_insn_field, X86_MODRM_MOD, etc in the header which are more or less copied from insn.h, right?
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --
| |