Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:03:50 +0100 | From | Tomasz Figa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain |
| |
On 12.01.2014 19:53, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >>> Could we get some more descriptive names for the domains? >> >> They are listed like this in user's manual, e.g. DOMAIN_F, DOMAIN_I, >> DOMAIN_G, etc. > > I guessed so. So the manual sucks. Would it be feasible to get it more > descriptive (like "Domain_G (GPU)")?
Does the name really matter that much? I changed original ones in this patch simply to make it easier to grep for domain related messages in kernel output (e.g. dmesg | grep domain). It was not the main part of this patch.
Also, there are multiple devices in most domains, so that would rather end up being "Domain_I (JPEG, Cam I/F)", "Domain_P (2D, TV Enc., Scaler)", "Domain_F (Rot, Post, LCD)".
If you really insist, I can change this, but I fail to see what effect it would really have.
Best regards, Tomasz
| |