lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: Add check for number of available vectors before CPU down [v7]

* Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> wrote:

> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64791
>
> When a cpu is downed on a system, the irqs on the cpu are assigned to
> other cpus. It is possible, however, that when a cpu is downed there
> aren't enough free vectors on the remaining cpus to account for the
> vectors from the cpu that is being downed.
>
> This results in an interesting "overflow" condition where irqs are
> "assigned" to a CPU but are not handled.
>
> For example, when downing cpus on a 1-64 logical processor system:
>
> <snip>
> [ 232.021745] smpboot: CPU 61 is now offline
> [ 238.480275] smpboot: CPU 62 is now offline
> [ 245.991080] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 245.996270] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:264 dev_watchdog+0x246/0x250()
> [ 246.005688] NETDEV WATCHDOG: p786p1 (ixgbe): transmit queue 0 timed out
> [ 246.013070] Modules linked in: lockd sunrpc iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support sb_edac ixgbe microcode e1000e pcspkr joydev edac_core lpc_ich ioatdma ptp mdio mfd_core i2c_i801 dca pps_core i2c_core wmi acpi_cpufreq isci libsas scsi_transport_sas
> [ 246.037633] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.12.0+ #14
> [ 246.044451] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S4600LH ........../SVRBD-ROW_T, BIOS SE5C600.86B.01.08.0003.022620131521 02/26/2013
> [ 246.057371] 0000000000000009 ffff88081fa03d40 ffffffff8164fbf6 ffff88081fa0ee48
> [ 246.065728] ffff88081fa03d90 ffff88081fa03d80 ffffffff81054ecc ffff88081fa13040
> [ 246.074073] 0000000000000000 ffff88200cce0000 0000000000000040 0000000000000000
> [ 246.082430] Call Trace:
> [ 246.085174] <IRQ> [<ffffffff8164fbf6>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
> [ 246.091633] [<ffffffff81054ecc>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
> [ 246.098352] [<ffffffff81054fb6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
> [ 246.104786] [<ffffffff815710d6>] dev_watchdog+0x246/0x250
> [ 246.110923] [<ffffffff81570e90>] ? dev_deactivate_queue.constprop.31+0x80/0x80
> [ 246.119097] [<ffffffff8106092a>] call_timer_fn+0x3a/0x110
> [ 246.125224] [<ffffffff8106280f>] ? update_process_times+0x6f/0x80
> [ 246.132137] [<ffffffff81570e90>] ? dev_deactivate_queue.constprop.31+0x80/0x80
> [ 246.140308] [<ffffffff81061db0>] run_timer_softirq+0x1f0/0x2a0
> [ 246.146933] [<ffffffff81059a80>] __do_softirq+0xe0/0x220
> [ 246.152976] [<ffffffff8165fedc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
> [ 246.158920] [<ffffffff810045f5>] do_softirq+0x55/0x90
> [ 246.164670] [<ffffffff81059d35>] irq_exit+0xa5/0xb0
> [ 246.170227] [<ffffffff8166062a>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x4a/0x60
> [ 246.177324] [<ffffffff8165f40a>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x70
> [ 246.184041] <EOI> [<ffffffff81505a1b>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0x5b/0xe0
> [ 246.191559] [<ffffffff81505a17>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0x57/0xe0
> [ 246.198374] [<ffffffff81505b5d>] cpuidle_idle_call+0xbd/0x200
> [ 246.204900] [<ffffffff8100b7ae>] arch_cpu_idle+0xe/0x30
> [ 246.210846] [<ffffffff810a47b0>] cpu_startup_entry+0xd0/0x250
> [ 246.217371] [<ffffffff81646b47>] rest_init+0x77/0x80
> [ 246.223028] [<ffffffff81d09e8e>] start_kernel+0x3ee/0x3fb
> [ 246.229165] [<ffffffff81d0989f>] ? repair_env_string+0x5e/0x5e
> [ 246.235787] [<ffffffff81d095a5>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
> [ 246.242990] [<ffffffff81d0969f>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xf8/0xfc
> [ 246.249610] ---[ end trace fb74fdef54d79039 ]---
> [ 246.254807] ixgbe 0000:c2:00.0 p786p1: initiating reset due to tx timeout
> [ 246.262489] ixgbe 0000:c2:00.0 p786p1: Reset adapter
> Last login: Mon Nov 11 08:35:14 from 10.18.17.119
> [root@(none) ~]# [ 246.792676] ixgbe 0000:c2:00.0 p786p1: detected SFP+: 5
> [ 249.231598] ixgbe 0000:c2:00.0 p786p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
> [ 246.792676] ixgbe 0000:c2:00.0 p786p1: detected SFP+: 5
> [ 249.231598] ixgbe 0000:c2:00.0 p786p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
>
> (last lines keep repeating. ixgbe driver is dead until module reload.)
>
> If the downed cpu has more vectors than are free on the remaining cpus on the
> system, it is possible that some vectors are "orphaned" even though they are
> assigned to a cpu. In this case, since the ixgbe driver had a watchdog, the
> watchdog fired and notified that something was wrong.
>
> This patch adds a function, check_vectors(), to compare the number of vectors
> on the CPU going down and compares it to the number of vectors available on
> the system. If there aren't enough vectors for the CPU to go down, an
> error is returned and propogated back to userspace.
>
> v2: Do not need to look at percpu irqs
> v3: Need to check affinity to prevent counting of MSIs in IOAPIC Lowest
> Priority Mode
> v4: Additional changes suggested by Gong Chen.
> v5/v6/v7: Updated comment text
>
> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gong Chen <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com>
> Cc: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com>
> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> Cc: Janet Morgan <janet.morgan@intel.com>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Cc: Ruiv Wang <ruiv.wang@gmail.com>
> Cc: Gong Chen <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Gong Chen <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 6 ++++
> 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
> index 0ea10f27..cb6cfcd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ extern void irq_ctx_init(int cpu);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> +extern int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(void);
> extern void fixup_irqs(void);
> extern void irq_force_complete_move(int);
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> index 22d0687..579a49e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -262,6 +262,75 @@ __visible void smp_trace_x86_platform_ipi(struct pt_regs *regs)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vector_used_by_percpu_irq);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> +/*
> + * This cpu is going to be removed and its vectors migrated to the remaining
> + * online cpus. Check to see if there are enough vectors in the remaining cpus.
> + */
> +int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(void)
> +{
> + int irq, cpu;
> + unsigned int this_cpu, vector, this_count, count;
> + struct irq_desc *desc;
> + struct irq_data *data;
> + struct cpumask affinity_new, online_new;
> +
> + this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + cpumask_copy(&online_new, cpu_online_mask);
> + cpu_clear(this_cpu, online_new);
> +
> + this_count = 0;
> + for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
> + irq = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
> + if (irq >= 0) {
> + desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> + data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> + cpumask_copy(&affinity_new, data->affinity);
> + cpu_clear(this_cpu, affinity_new);
> +
> + /* Do not count inactive or per-cpu irqs. */
> + if (!irq_has_action(irq) || irqd_is_per_cpu(data))
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * A single irq may be mapped to multiple
> + * cpu's vector_irq[] (for example IOAPIC cluster
> + * mode). In this case we have two
> + * possibilities:
> + *
> + * 1) the resulting affinity mask is empty; that is
> + * this the down'd cpu is the last cpu in the irq's
> + * affinity mask, or
> + *
> + * 2) the resulting affinity mask is no longer
> + * a subset of the online cpus but the affinity
> + * mask is not zero; that is the down'd cpu is the
> + * last online cpu in a user set affinity mask.
> + */
> + if (cpumask_empty(&affinity_new) ||
> + !cpumask_subset(&affinity_new, &online_new))
> + this_count++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + count = 0;
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + if (cpu == this_cpu)
> + continue;
> + for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS;
> + vector++) {
> + if (per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] < 0)
> + count++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (count < this_count) {
> + pr_warn("CPU %d disable failed: CPU has %u vectors assigned and there are only %u available.\n",
> + this_cpu, this_count, count);
> + return -ERANGE;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /* A cpu has been removed from cpu_online_mask. Reset irq affinities. */
> void fixup_irqs(void)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index 85dc05a..391ea52 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -1312,6 +1312,12 @@ void cpu_disable_common(void)
>
> int native_cpu_disable(void)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable();
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> clear_local_APIC();
>
> cpu_disable_common();

Looks mostly OK, but how about locking: can an IRQ be allocated in
parallel while all this is going on?

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-12 11:21    [W:1.998 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site