Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Jan 2014 02:43:07 +0100 | From | Joakim Hernberg <> | Subject | Re: Problem: Possible regression in intel_pstate on 3.12 |
| |
Hello Dirk,
I don't seem to be able to apply this patch? For what kernel is it meant, and is it complete?
Best wishes,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:28:19 -0800 Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Joakim, > > Add the following patch to your v3.12 kernel and collect some data > with the command and send the resulting perf.data file: > perf record -a -c 1 -e power:pstate_sample sleep 10 > > > TIA > --Dirk > > commit b3dc2c2a106cea68e4c9c0f4747b15291113c4ae > Author: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> > Date: Mon Dec 2 09:56:46 2013 -0800 > > intel_pstate: Add trace point to report internal state. > > Add perf trace event "power:pstate_sample" to report driver > state to aid in diagnosing issues reported against intel_pstate. > > Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++ > include/trace/events/power.h | 53 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 75 > insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c index 5f1cbae..c4f14d1 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ static inline int32_t div_fp(int32_t x, int32_t y) > return div_s64((int64_t)x << FRAC_BITS, (int64_t)y); > } > > +static u64 energy_divisor; > + > struct sample { > int32_t core_pct_busy; > u64 aperf; > @@ -512,6 +514,7 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_sample(struct > cpudata *cpu) > > rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf); > rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf); > + > cpu->sample_ptr = (cpu->sample_ptr + 1) % SAMPLE_COUNT; > cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].aperf = aperf; > cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr].mperf = mperf; > @@ -565,10 +568,24 @@ static inline void > intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu) > static void intel_pstate_timer_func(unsigned long __data) > { > struct cpudata *cpu = (struct cpudata *) __data; > + struct sample *sample; > + u64 energy; > > intel_pstate_sample(cpu); > + > + sample = &cpu->samples[cpu->sample_ptr]; > + rdmsrl(MSR_PKG_ENERGY_STATUS, energy); > + > intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(cpu); > > + trace_pstate_sample(fp_toint(sample->core_pct_busy), > + fp_toint(intel_pstate_get_scaled_busy(cpu)), > + cpu->pstate.current_pstate, > + sample->mperf, > + sample->aperf, > + energy/energy_divisor, > + sample->freq); > + > if (cpu->pstate.current_pstate == cpu->pstate.min_pstate) { > cpu->min_pstate_count++; > if (!(cpu->min_pstate_count % 5)) { > @@ -849,6 +866,7 @@ static int __init intel_pstate_init(void) > int cpu, rc = 0; > const struct x86_cpu_id *id; > struct cpu_defaults *cpu_info; > + u64 units; > > if (no_load) > return -ENODEV; > @@ -882,8 +900,12 @@ static int __init intel_pstate_init(void) > if (rc) > goto out; > > + rdmsrl(MSR_RAPL_POWER_UNIT, units); > + energy_divisor = 1 << ((units >> 8) & 0x1f); /* bits{12:8} */ > + > intel_pstate_debug_expose_params(); > intel_pstate_sysfs_expose_params(); > + > return rc; > out: > get_online_cpus(); > diff --git a/include/trace/events/power.h > b/include/trace/events/power.h index cda100d..9e9475c 100644 > --- a/include/trace/events/power.h > +++ b/include/trace/events/power.h > @@ -35,6 +35,59 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(cpu, cpu_idle, > TP_ARGS(state, cpu_id) > ); > > +TRACE_EVENT(pstate_sample, > + > + TP_PROTO(u32 core_busy, > + u32 scaled_busy, > + u32 state, > + u64 mperf, > + u64 aperf, > + u32 energy, > + u32 freq > + ), > + > + TP_ARGS(core_busy, > + scaled_busy, > + state, > + mperf, > + aperf, > + energy, > + freq > + ), > + > + TP_STRUCT__entry( > + __field(u32, core_busy) > + __field(u32, scaled_busy) > + __field(u32, state) > + __field(u64, mperf) > + __field(u64, aperf) > + __field(u32, energy) > + __field(u32, freq) > + > + ), > +
--
Joakim
| |