Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:52:30 -0500 (EST) | From | Alan Stern <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHSET v2 driver-core-next] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core: implement synchronous self-removal |
| |
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 01:51:10PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hey, Alan. > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:46:10AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > > The SUBJECT lines in your patch emails don't mention the version > > > number. That is, they just say "[PATCH]", not "[PATCH v2]" or "[PATCH > > > v3]". This makes it very difficult for me to tell which messages to > > > read. > > > > Hmm... they're all threaded. I add version tags when posting > > incremental patches but usually don't bother with it when posting a > > new version of the whole series. After all, some patches are get > > updated without explicitly given a new version for refrehses and stuff > > so it's not like you can determine everything based on subjects only.
Greg, what do you prefer in this situation?
> > > (Reading them in order doesn't work, because my computer mixes up the > > > order of messages when it downloads a large bunch from the email > > > server. It's kind of annoying...) > > > > And they aren't threaded? > > They were all threaded for me, perhaps Alan needs a better email client :)
Undoubtedly I do. My current client is embarassingly old.
Alan Stern
| |