Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:27:37 -0800 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] rcu_dereference_check_fdtable fix/cleanups |
| |
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 07:19:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 01/10, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:34:59PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > > doesn't this look much simpler than adding the "bool unshared" argument > > > and changing the callers? > > > > I might be being too paranoid, but my concern with using rcu_lock_acquire() > > and rcu_lock_release() > > And I agree, I no longer suggest to use rcu_lock_acquire/release. > > It seems that you misunderstood me, let me send v2 for review.
Ah, I did misunderstand you. For both:
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanx, Paul
| |