Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Jan 2014 10:02:55 +0100 | From | Manfred Spraul <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -next 0/7] ipc: some misc updates & optimizations |
| |
Hi David,
On 01/10/2014 07:48 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > A few updates to the ipc code, mostly some very needed cleanups (yes, we still > have loads more to do, but it's a start). Nothing particularly interesting, > except perhaps for the last two patches, which include a locking optimization > and barrier documentation for message queues. Absolutely no functional changes. > > Applies on top of linux-next + Manfred's 'whitespace cleanup' patch. Tested > with LTP. Now you confuse me. In your other mail, you write that my patch doesn't apply to linux-next:
On 01/07/2014 06:12 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > This patch doesn't apply on top of linux-next (which now includes > Rafael's changes), could you please resend? I'm planning some more > cleanups on top of this so, if Andrew agrees, I can include these > changes to my patchset. Thanks, Davidlohr
Perhaps: Could you include (and update, if required) my patch into your patchset? It's probably simpler if we have only one set of ipc cleanups around.
> Thanks! > > Davidlohr Bueso (7): > ipc: standardize code comments > ipc: remove braces for single statements > ipc: remove useless return statement > ipc: simplify sysvipc_proc_open return > ipc: delete seq_max field in struct ipc_ids Acked-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> > ipc: share ids rwsem when possible in ipcget_public This patch is a real change. Could you at least make it the last one in the series? I will try to review it, but I don't know yet when I will find the time.
> ipc,msg: document barriers Acked-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
-- Manfred
| |