lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/6 v2] crypto:s5p-sss: Add device tree support
From
Hi Naveen,

On 10 January 2014 11:37, Naveen Krishna Ch <naveenkrishna.ch@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Tomasz,
>

[snip]
>>> *pdev)
>>> static struct platform_driver s5p_aes_crypto = {
>>> .probe = s5p_aes_probe,
>>> .remove = s5p_aes_remove,
>>> + .id_table = s5p_sss_ids,
>>> .driver = {
>>> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>> .name = "s5p-secss",
>>> + .of_match_table = s5p_sss_dt_match,
>>
>>
>> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(s5p_sss_dt_match),
> I dint use it, Some time back there was a patchset from Sachin
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/28/61
> Please suggest me on this.

In those cases the structure was always compiled in. i.e., it was not protected
by #ifdef CONFIG_OF. Hence use of of_match_ptr was not required. of_match_ptr
abstracts this check depending on OF is enabled or not. In the case of
this (sss) driver,
since you are using CONFIG_OF to selectively compile out the code (and esp.
s5p_sss_dt_match structure), use of of_match_ptr will make the code
simpler as it
avoids the use of a dummy structure definition (the #else part of the
struct definition) when OF is
disabled. Hope this clarifies.

--
With warm regards,
Sachin


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-10 08:01    [W:0.120 / U:0.696 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site