lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "intel_idle: mark states tables with __initdata tag"
Date
On Thursday, January 09, 2014 02:38:14 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, January 09, 2014 02:20:22 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thursday, January 09, 2014 03:30:26 PM Jiang Liu wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 9d046ccb98085f1d437585f84748c783a04ba240.
> > >
> > > Commit 9d046ccb98085 marks all state tables with __initdata, but
> > > the state table may be accessed when doing CPU online, which then
> > > causing system crash as below:
> >
> > Uh, sorry for that - it most likely got missed since I tested it
> > together with intel_idle_cpu_init() removal patches (they are in
> > Rafael's PM tree now).
> >
> > Anyway, better than reverting it altogether would be to fix it by
> > backporting the following patch:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/20/372
> >
> > Could you please try to solve the issue this way?
>
> No, it's too late for that as far as 3.13 is concerned.
>
> I have the patch above queued up for 3.14, though, so do you think that the
> commit being reverted here can be safely re-applied on top of it?

Yes, the reverted commit can be safely re-applied on top of this patch.

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-10 10:41    [W:1.698 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site