lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Results] [RFC PATCH v4 00/40] mm: Memory Power Management
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:15:21 -0700 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On 9/25/2013 4:47 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> Also, the changelogs don't appear to discuss one obvious downside: the
> >> latency incurred in bringing a bank out of one of the low-power states
> >> and back into full operation. Please do discuss and quantify that to
> >> the best of your knowledge.
> >
> > On Sandy Bridge the memry wakeup overhead is really small. It's on by default
> > in most setups today.
>
> btw note that those kind of memory power savings are content-preserving,
> so likely a whole chunk of these patches is not actually needed on SNB
> (or anything else Intel sells or sold)

(head spinning a bit). Could you please expand on this rather a lot?



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-26 04:01    [W:1.017 / U:0.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site