lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Regression on cpufreq in v3.12-rc1
On 09/20/2013 10:31 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20 September 2013 22:04, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>> In this case we have neither. So the cpufreq driver fails to
>> register. But the kernel used to survive in any case, as you
>> could call cpufreq_get() without a cpufreq driver registered.
>
> Aha, so exactly what I suspected in my first mail..
>

Yep, your analysis was perfect right from the beginning :-)

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-21 08:21    [W:0.056 / U:1.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site