Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor() | Date | Mon, 02 Sep 2013 14:44:47 +0200 |
| |
On Sunday, September 01, 2013 09:30:49 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 1 September 2013 18:58, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > On Sunday, September 01, 2013 10:56:02 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> We can't take a big lock around __cpufreq_governor() as this causes recursive > >> locking for some cases. But calls to this routine must be serialized for every > >> policy. > > > > Care to explain here why it must be serialized? > > Yes, added that to the attached patches (Added reported-by too):
OK, the attached patches queued up for 3.12.
Thanks, Rafael
| |