Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:02:55 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Kconfig.debug: Add FRAME_POINTER anti-dependency for ARC | From | Gilad Ben-Yossef <> |
| |
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote: > > Frame pointer on ARC doesn't serve the conventional purpose of stack > unwinding due to the typical way ABI designates it's usage.
More out of curiosity to understand the platform better than actual review - can you explain a little what you meant by this statement?
Is this statement because of the use of write back mode with ld/st to or not related?
Thanks, Gilad
-- Gilad Ben-Yossef Chief Coffee Drinker gilad@benyossef.com Israel Cell: +972-52-8260388 US Cell: +1-973-8260388 http://benyossef.com
"If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a situation where the homework eats your dog?" -- Jean-Baptiste Queru
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |