Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:54:07 +0100 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mfd: arizona: Update volatile registers for WM5110 DSP |
| |
> No problem sorry the commit message was a little vague there. > Seems I accidentally generated the first version of this patch > against the ASoC tree, but this got me thinking now you are > looking after MFD patches which tree should I be generating them > against?
That depends. If you are submitting MFD only patches and you base them on either Sam's [1] or my tree [2], you probably won't go too far wrong.
However, if your patch or patch-set touches other subsystems then the latest -rc is usually appropriate.
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 08:24:25AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Charles Keepax wrote: > > > > Any chance of a little more information in the commit message? > > > > What are scratch registers and why are they required now where they > > weren't before? Why are the control and clocking regulators no longer > > needed?
[1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sameo/mfd-next.git - master [2] git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/mfd.git - for-mfd-next
-- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |