Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: "memory" binding issues | From | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> | Date | Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:47:19 +1000 |
| |
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 15:48 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > A node that has a "reg" property should have the corresponding unit > > address. > > No, absolutely _NOT_ a requirement. Unit address is only required if > needed to disambiguate two properties with the same name. > > If there are no ambiguities, then leaving off the unit address is much > preferred.
I disagree :-)
Also this would be only true of our find_node_by_path was capable of handling it, which it isn't. Thus you end up with generic code looking for /memory and finding nothing ...
Cheers, Ben.
| |