lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 8/9] spi: prepare runtime PM support for SPI devices
    On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 01:04:55PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
    > On Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:43:02 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
    > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:31:45AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
    > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:27:43PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
    > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:51:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > > I would be able to have this and the other patch in the SPI tree in case
    > > > > > it overlaps with other work - I'm not sure what the plan will be for
    > > > > > merging this stuff but if there were a branch which I could merge into
    > > > > > the SPI tree that'd be good.
    > > >
    > > > > I think these two can go via your SPI tree as they shouldn't have
    > > > > dependencies to the I2C tree.
    > > >
    > > > There's all the driver changes though - it seems best to push the whole
    > > > series through one branch so there's fewer bisection problems.
    > >
    > > Ah, right. Then I suppose the right tree would be the I2C tree (as majority
    > > of the patches are I2C related)?
    > >
    > > Wolfram, are you OK with this?
    >
    > Alternatively, I can apply them too if everyone is OK with that.
    >
    > They are PM+ACPI changes after all ...

    I'd like to give at least an ACK. But I need to find some time for that.
    Is it urgent? Looks like 3.13 material to me...

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-09-12 13:21    [W:6.446 / U:0.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site