[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-designware: make *CNT values configurable

> > >Would it make sense to add generic I2C device tree properties for those
> > >parameters? These parameters are independent of the actual bus driver,
> > >rather a PCB property... And as such the correct place would be device
> > >tree or ACPI or similar.
> >
> > If there are other bus drivers that make use of tr/tf transition
> > times, I think it makes sense.
> Wolfram, what's your opinion on this?

If it is a PCB property, it makes sense to have generic bindings for
it. Can they have very-safe defaults and thus be optional?

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-05 12:21    [W:0.117 / U:1.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site