Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Aug 2013 18:58:35 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/10] CPUFreq: Fixes & Cleanups for 3.12 | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 3 August 2013 17:37, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > On Saturday, August 03, 2013 05:19:18 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >> >> This patchset tries to fix & cleanup many existing cpufreq core issues. First >> four patches tries to cleanup basic problems in cpufreq core. Its first patch >> was earlier sent separately but now is part of this series. >> >> Fifth patch was also sent earlier as reply to your patches and was reviewed by >> Srivatsa. Sixth patch was picked from Lukasz's patchset on introducing software >> "boost" feature in core. It will be used by this patchset. >> >> And last four are the most significant part of this set. They try to make many >> things simple and robust. >> >> This is rebased of your bleeding-edge branch + two patches from you: >> 18a6b03 cpufreq: Avoid double kobject_put() for the same kobject in error code path >> d0cde63 cpufreq: Do not hold driver module references for additional policy CPUs >> abe513f Merge branch 'acpi-sleep-next' into linux-next >> >> They are also pushed in my cpufreq-next branch > > How much testing has that received so far?
I planned to add this information but forgot at the last moment. It was partially tested. As it was mostly developed over the weekend I wasn't able to do much of testing. I posted it to get early comments, and testing would complete by beginning of next week.
-- viresh
| |