Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:10:55 +0100 | From | Mel Gorman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpuset: mm: Reduce large amounts of memory barrier related damage v3 |
| |
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:14:19PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > I intended to say nr_node_ids, the same size as buffers such as the > > task_numa_buffers. If we ever return a nid > nr_node_ids here then > > task_numa_fault would corrupt memory. However, it should be possible for > > node_weight to exceed nr_node_ids except maybe during node hot-remove so > > it's not the problem. > > The nodemask situation seems somewhat more confused than the cpumask > case; how would we ever return a nid > nr_node_ids? Corrupt nodemask? >
ARGH. I meant impossible. The exact bloody opposite of what I wrote.
-- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs
| |