lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [Query] CPUFreq: Why do we need policy->user_policy?
From
On 28 August 2013 02:50, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:04:52 PM Lan Tianyu wrote:

>> From my understanding.policy->min/max may be modified by some drivers
>> but the user_policy only store user space config and should not be changed
>> by other reason. :)
>
> Yes, that was the original idea IIRC, so separate user settings from stuff that
> may be changed internally by the kernel.

Yeah, that's what I understood too now.. Anyway I am going to do some core
cleanups now, drivers are mostly done and will see if something can be done
to get rid of them... Otherwise will keep them as is.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-28 08:21    [W:0.077 / U:0.764 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site