| Date | Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:59:40 -0600 | From | Stephen Warren <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC v2 13/16] ARM: tegra: split tegra_pmc_init() in two |
| |
On 08/27/2013 03:28 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> > > Tegra's board file currently initializes clocks much earlier than those > for most other ARM SoCs. The reason is: > > * The PMC HW block is involved in the path of some interrupts (i.e. it > inverts, or not, the IRQ input pin dedicated to the PMIC). > > * So, that part of the PMC must be initialized early so that the IRQ > polarity is correct. > > * The PMC initialization is currently monolithic, and the PMC has some > clock inputs, so the init routine ends up calling of_clk_get_by_name(), > and hence clocks must be set up early too. > > In order to defer clock initialization to the more typical location, > split out the portions of tegra_pmc_init() that are truly IRQ-related > into a separate tegra_pmc_init_irq(), which can be called from the > machine descriptor's .init_irq() function, and defer the rest until > the machine descriptor's .init_machine() function. With arch/arm calling > of_clk_init(NULL) from time_init() this also allows the removal of > .init_time() hook. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> > --- > Changelog: > v1->v2: > - took Stephen Warren's patch provided to separate Tegra's pmc_init > - sqashed in .init_time removal and reworded patch text
I think it'd be better to keep the 2 patches separate so the two logical changes are in different patches. I suppose it isn't a huge deal though.
Either way, on this patch, your S-o-b line is missing above.
|